Some suggestions @ Roulette:
- Consider betting only consistent & thoroughly studied numerical *events*. (e.g. the Nth repetition of a plein).
- Consider making your recoup in several hits. (We all want a single hit and done... yet the smarter MM schemes always contemplate dividing the recoup to keep the units exposure manageable)
- If possible, when experiencing unlikely/"black swan" events, consider "tasting" a bit on them with exceeding units. If you hit, then squeeze the outlier event to the max. It helps the averages.
Cheers!
Vic
There are other suggestions @ Roulette:
- Shift from the one-spin mentality. (Instead, bet on events comprising groups of spins / cycles).
- Shift from the all-or-nothing mentality. (Once you have shifted to cycles/multiple-spin events, the game becomes more relaxing. Now you can even spend multiple spins without a hit while keeping your cool, since you know that the thoroughly-studied events have reasonable boundaries to kick-in within your session range so you can get to the hits again, into the positive side; in a most-natural manner, since it goes both ways: you can't win forever but you also can't lose forever :) There is a natural flow of the game when you use cycles, the gist is using this flow in an advantageous/conscious course of action).
- Win the most when winning, lose the least when losing. (This derives from the above. When you are betting a set of multiple spins, clearly defined within a sound framework, you learn that the best way to traverse a negative tram is with minimal units & the best way of squeezing a positive tram is raising reasonably %-wise for taking advantage of the clump of wins that comprise the positive tram in full. You learn to see the game as the dance of concentration and dispersion of hits it is... and learn to act accordingly)
In the end, you see roulette repeating the same "numerical song" over and over, so it is only natural that you resolve to play to the tune of your thoroughly-studied cyclical game, and make your unit value "dance" to the concentration/dispersion rhythm as it unfolds in front of you during the session,
while also keeping the big picture in mind (that is: the single micro-cycle & the overall bankroll averages).
Cheers!
Vic
Vic,
Thanks for the suggestions.
I somehow believe from my experience that bet selection is not that important. With a careful progressive approach such as 1-N you can possibly come out on top every session.
Would you agree?
Having said that, what is the use of bet selection that is suggested by RBT client?
One more: do you have the same bet selection in both version 1 and version 2?
I really played some real games using the suggestions given by tool. Most times they are so dynamic every spin that you tend to hit current spin with one of your previous selections(thereby effectively missing them). My question here is: should we keep some static selections for few spins before we move on to next ones?
Lastly, would you care to explain the algorithm used in the tool v2.x, if it's meant to be made public?
Thanks!