Recent posts
#21
Albalaha / Re: PERSONAL MENTORING OFFER W...
Last post by Albalaha - Jul 01, 2026, 08:09 AMIroically, most of the persons coming up for mentorship are novices no real experince of playing, have no sufficient bankroll. A guy approached me on email sayig he wants to play professionally and have about $150 bankroll. A few oversmart guys came up saying you give me your method with tracker and I will then play and win and share profits. Comeon! This method which has all weather approach is hardwork of my three decades of play and research and I developed it by thinking, reading, innovating all along.
Please do not even think of playing with handful of money. Better pay for grocery and rent with them.
Professional playing needs experience and spare money for good bankroll. Those who are in pathetic state financially should not even look at a casino.
Please do not even think of playing with handful of money. Better pay for grocery and rent with them.
Professional playing needs experience and spare money for good bankroll. Those who are in pathetic state financially should not even look at a casino.
#22
Albalaha / Re: PERSONAL MENTORING OFFER W...
Last post by Rotciv - Jul 01, 2026, 07:27 AMCongratulations on the tracker and the work behind it. The screenshots are very interesting and they help a lot in understanding the general concept. If you have time, it would be great to clarify a bit more about the internal logic of a few components, especially how RTM is triggered, how the extra units are calculated, and how Labby compression works in practice.
No need to share the code, just a few structural details would already be very helpful for those of us trying to understand the difference between a well-designed tracker and a classic progression. Any additional explanation about the engine states, mode transitions, and reset conditions would be highly appreciated.
No need to share the code, just a few structural details would already be very helpful for those of us trying to understand the difference between a well-designed tracker and a classic progression. Any additional explanation about the engine states, mode transitions, and reset conditions would be highly appreciated.
#23
General discussion / Re: Discussing gambling with A...
Last post by Bally6354 - Jun 30, 2026, 04:05 PM #24
General discussion / Re: Discussing gambling with A...
Last post by Bally6354 - Jun 30, 2026, 04:00 PMOh well, looks like that didn't work then! 
#25
General discussion / Re: Discussing gambling with A...
Last post by Bally6354 - Jun 30, 2026, 03:58 PM #26
General discussion / Re: Discussing gambling with A...
Last post by Bally6354 - Jun 30, 2026, 03:57 PMHey, thanks Albalaha, that's great! I took your advice and tried using a few different AI bots for coding and I found Grok was quite good.
For years, I kept saying I would look into coding because I think it can help with our learning. Anyway, now that I have some more spare time, I can get to grips with it. To be honest, I feel you need it for online play (if that's your thing) because it's impossible otherwise with such a limited timespan available between spins/hands.
Here is a snapshot of my Voisins, Tiers and Orphelins Tracker. If I can find a way to share it with anybody who wants it, they are welcome to it.
Cheers
For years, I kept saying I would look into coding because I think it can help with our learning. Anyway, now that I have some more spare time, I can get to grips with it. To be honest, I feel you need it for online play (if that's your thing) because it's impossible otherwise with such a limited timespan available between spins/hands.
Here is a snapshot of my Voisins, Tiers and Orphelins Tracker. If I can find a way to share it with anybody who wants it, they are welcome to it.
Cheers
#27
Albalaha / Re: PERSONAL MENTORING OFFER W...
Last post by Albalaha - Jun 28, 2026, 10:42 AMWhy Traditional Progressions Fail
I have studied the classics—Martingale, Fibonacci, and even the standard Labouchere—and they all share a fatal flaw: rigidity. They assume the worst‑case streak has a fixed limit, but it never does. They increase bets relentlessly regardless of how the losses occurred, and they have no mechanism to differentiate between a temporary cold spell and a structural losing trend. In practice, this means they plough forward into heavy storms, doubling down until they hit table limits or blow the bankroll. They are built for perfect theoretical conditions, not the chaotic, alternating reality of actual sessions.
Why My Systems Have a Fair Chance:
I designed my trackers to abandon that rigid mindset. Instead of betting against the streak, I built them to bet with the statistical context. My edge is not in predicting the next win—it is in dynamic risk recalibration. I continuously measure two live metrics: the active win rate, excluding paused periods, and the disparity between losses and wins since the last peak. When the data says this is dangerous, I pause or slow down. When the data says this is favourable, I accelerate. This does not guarantee a profit—nothing can. But it gives me a genuine mathematical buffer that protects the bankroll during bad variance and capitalises aggressively during good variance. I am not fighting the weather; I am reacting to the forecast.
How My Systems Handle All Weather Conditions
In extreme cold, which means a prolonged losing streak, losses pile up and bet sizes threaten to explode. My PAUSE mechanism triggers automatically. I stop betting entirely until the statistical disparity heals. There is no betting in a blizzard.
In heavy rainfall, the session becomes choppy with alternating wins and losses that confuse rigid progressions. My performance‑adaptive modes keep bets near the floor. I do not escalate on isolated losses, which prevents the whipsaw effect that destroys traditional systems.
In scorching dry heat, where the win rate drops just below the break‑even zone but without a massive drawdown, my FLAT threshold kicks in. I drop to the absolute minimum unit bet, conserving capital like water in a desert, waiting for conditions to improve.
When the sunny hot streak arrives and wins start clustering after a drawdown, my All‑Time‑High reset wipes the slate clean, and my escalation modes take over. I recover losses quickly and efficiently while the sun is shining.
Finally, in a tornado scenario—a massive drawdown followed by sudden positive cluster—the PAUSE re‑entry gate ensures I do not jump back in too early. Once confirmed, the ATH reset gives me a fresh start, ensuring I do not chase old ghosts.
Traditional systems are like driving with the accelerator stuck down—they crash or burn. My systems are like driving with a smart gearbox, brakes, and a weather radar. I do not fight the session; I let the session tell me what to do. That is why I believe my MINI and MIDI trackers have a fair chance in every type of weather, from the harshest winters to the hottest summers.
I have studied the classics—Martingale, Fibonacci, and even the standard Labouchere—and they all share a fatal flaw: rigidity. They assume the worst‑case streak has a fixed limit, but it never does. They increase bets relentlessly regardless of how the losses occurred, and they have no mechanism to differentiate between a temporary cold spell and a structural losing trend. In practice, this means they plough forward into heavy storms, doubling down until they hit table limits or blow the bankroll. They are built for perfect theoretical conditions, not the chaotic, alternating reality of actual sessions.
Why My Systems Have a Fair Chance:
I designed my trackers to abandon that rigid mindset. Instead of betting against the streak, I built them to bet with the statistical context. My edge is not in predicting the next win—it is in dynamic risk recalibration. I continuously measure two live metrics: the active win rate, excluding paused periods, and the disparity between losses and wins since the last peak. When the data says this is dangerous, I pause or slow down. When the data says this is favourable, I accelerate. This does not guarantee a profit—nothing can. But it gives me a genuine mathematical buffer that protects the bankroll during bad variance and capitalises aggressively during good variance. I am not fighting the weather; I am reacting to the forecast.
How My Systems Handle All Weather Conditions
In extreme cold, which means a prolonged losing streak, losses pile up and bet sizes threaten to explode. My PAUSE mechanism triggers automatically. I stop betting entirely until the statistical disparity heals. There is no betting in a blizzard.
In heavy rainfall, the session becomes choppy with alternating wins and losses that confuse rigid progressions. My performance‑adaptive modes keep bets near the floor. I do not escalate on isolated losses, which prevents the whipsaw effect that destroys traditional systems.
In scorching dry heat, where the win rate drops just below the break‑even zone but without a massive drawdown, my FLAT threshold kicks in. I drop to the absolute minimum unit bet, conserving capital like water in a desert, waiting for conditions to improve.
When the sunny hot streak arrives and wins start clustering after a drawdown, my All‑Time‑High reset wipes the slate clean, and my escalation modes take over. I recover losses quickly and efficiently while the sun is shining.
Finally, in a tornado scenario—a massive drawdown followed by sudden positive cluster—the PAUSE re‑entry gate ensures I do not jump back in too early. Once confirmed, the ATH reset gives me a fresh start, ensuring I do not chase old ghosts.
Traditional systems are like driving with the accelerator stuck down—they crash or burn. My systems are like driving with a smart gearbox, brakes, and a weather radar. I do not fight the session; I let the session tell me what to do. That is why I believe my MINI and MIDI trackers have a fair chance in every type of weather, from the harshest winters to the hottest summers.
#28
General discussion / Re: Discussing gambling with A...
Last post by Albalaha - Jun 28, 2026, 10:25 AMThey usually negate any idea as a potential winner. Chatgpt is the worst of them. Use deepseek instead if you want your ideas coded but unless you have basic skills they might confuse you with even basics. I got frustrated a number of times when they gave me wrong simulations results. At times, they get so silly with even core statistical and mathematical stuff that it feels that I am talking to a kid. In nutshell, you can not expect any innovation from them, just assistance and that too needs supervision. You would wonder that they even insert a prophecy bug that looks ahead of future outcomes and change betting accordingly giving false gains. They even change bet amounts so u should be able to check all that. It has wasted hundreds of hours of mine, so far, with fake results. One thing you can do is to cross check any coding for bugs from another AI.
#29
Splits / Re: Tiers, voisins and Orpheli...
Last post by Bally6354 - Jun 27, 2026, 01:28 PMOne good thing about posting on forums is that I always found it helped my creative side. When you are typing out your posts, it forces you to think about what you are saying and that can promote new ideas to explore.
I already mentioned in the above post about the triple hit on the 12 and so it has got me thinking about how to possibly use this concept as a good way to isolate the hot numbers.
Taking another Wiesbaden table from yesterday.
01 O
20 O
36 T
23 T (So orphelins and tiers with those 0's, 3's and 6's in play.)
33 T
30 T
15 V
08 T
29 V
22 V (Here is where I would now consider the Voisin and tiers in play)
28 V
09 O
30 T (repeat on the 30)
32 V
25 V
17 O
13 T
13 T (repeat)
23 T (repeat)
05 T
05 T (repeat)
31 O
22 V (repeat)
28 V (repeat)
17 O (repeat)
25 V (repeat)
22 V (triple hit)
07 V
05 T (triple hit)
36 T (repeat)
02 V
23 T (triple hit)
36 T (triple hit)
So looking at that first triple hit, it was 22 V which was preceded by a 25 V (so 2's and 5's) and when the 23 T had it's triple hit, it was preceded by the 2 V and 36 T (0's, 3's and 6's with a gap of 1) and the last number 36 T was a triple hit preceded by the 23 T (again, 0's, 3's and 6's)
I did a lot of work looking into Turbo's ideas for hot numbers and so the idea of isolating hot numbers is a fascinating one. I think it all merits looking into a bit further.
cheers
I already mentioned in the above post about the triple hit on the 12 and so it has got me thinking about how to possibly use this concept as a good way to isolate the hot numbers.
Taking another Wiesbaden table from yesterday.
01 O
20 O
36 T
23 T (So orphelins and tiers with those 0's, 3's and 6's in play.)
33 T
30 T
15 V
08 T
29 V
22 V (Here is where I would now consider the Voisin and tiers in play)
28 V
09 O
30 T (repeat on the 30)
32 V
25 V
17 O
13 T
13 T (repeat)
23 T (repeat)
05 T
05 T (repeat)
31 O
22 V (repeat)
28 V (repeat)
17 O (repeat)
25 V (repeat)
22 V (triple hit)
07 V
05 T (triple hit)
36 T (repeat)
02 V
23 T (triple hit)
36 T (triple hit)
So looking at that first triple hit, it was 22 V which was preceded by a 25 V (so 2's and 5's) and when the 23 T had it's triple hit, it was preceded by the 2 V and 36 T (0's, 3's and 6's with a gap of 1) and the last number 36 T was a triple hit preceded by the 23 T (again, 0's, 3's and 6's)
I did a lot of work looking into Turbo's ideas for hot numbers and so the idea of isolating hot numbers is a fascinating one. I think it all merits looking into a bit further.
cheers
#30
General discussion / Discussing gambling with AI
Last post by Bally6354 - Jun 27, 2026, 12:55 PMI didn't want to send Albalaha's Baccarat thread off-topic too much and so thought I would start this thread because I think it's quite interesting.
I had said that I had used Chat GTP in conjunction with Google Sheets to help me in some Baccarat studies and it really did help and the chat was very useful.
Albalaha said the following....
'Regarding use of chatgpt, a cautious approach should be used. As per a recent research by leading universities of USA, these LLM, AI models are meant to satisfy and affirm user even if he is wrong. You would smile that so far, chatgpt,deepseek, grok, gemini, claude, perplexity, co pilot ( I use all) all have confirmed my methods winning over millions of hands and when I deeply check that, I found prophecy(lookahead) bugs and even calculations bugs that create artificial wins. So you should not trust them blindly but use them as assistant and minutely check their findings. Do not rely upon them blindly. Secondly, they are trained to say that any method can not beat randomness despite themselves wrongly concluding methods a winner over millions of hands. That is an antithesis but they do so.''
Albalaha, I agree with you 100%. You do need to be very careful when discussing concepts with these AI bots because I have found they often get things wrong and then once you correct them, they say you were right and so it does leave you scratching your heads sometimes.
The filters they use are out to protect people from a lot of gambling mis-information which I suppose is fair enough. I have always found that if I state upfront that I am aware that gambling games are negative expectation and that it's just a hobby for me, that the AI is then more willing to discuss anything I want to related to gambling and can be of some use.
When I asked for help with the Google Sheets, I didn't even mention it was for gambling. I had my ideas/concepts and just needed help putting it all together. The notations I used like B for Banker or P for Player made the AI unaware exactly what I was doing. So basically what I am saying is that there are ways around it where you can still get help if you need it.
Yes the AI is very good sometimes at telling you exactly what you want to hear as Albalaha as said and so you just have use your common sense and take from it what you need.
In conclusion, my dialogue with the various AI machines has been very helpful and I would certainly say it helped accelerate my learning and understanding as well regarding some of my concepts that I use for gambling.
Cheers
I had said that I had used Chat GTP in conjunction with Google Sheets to help me in some Baccarat studies and it really did help and the chat was very useful.
Albalaha said the following....
'Regarding use of chatgpt, a cautious approach should be used. As per a recent research by leading universities of USA, these LLM, AI models are meant to satisfy and affirm user even if he is wrong. You would smile that so far, chatgpt,deepseek, grok, gemini, claude, perplexity, co pilot ( I use all) all have confirmed my methods winning over millions of hands and when I deeply check that, I found prophecy(lookahead) bugs and even calculations bugs that create artificial wins. So you should not trust them blindly but use them as assistant and minutely check their findings. Do not rely upon them blindly. Secondly, they are trained to say that any method can not beat randomness despite themselves wrongly concluding methods a winner over millions of hands. That is an antithesis but they do so.''
Albalaha, I agree with you 100%. You do need to be very careful when discussing concepts with these AI bots because I have found they often get things wrong and then once you correct them, they say you were right and so it does leave you scratching your heads sometimes.
The filters they use are out to protect people from a lot of gambling mis-information which I suppose is fair enough. I have always found that if I state upfront that I am aware that gambling games are negative expectation and that it's just a hobby for me, that the AI is then more willing to discuss anything I want to related to gambling and can be of some use.
When I asked for help with the Google Sheets, I didn't even mention it was for gambling. I had my ideas/concepts and just needed help putting it all together. The notations I used like B for Banker or P for Player made the AI unaware exactly what I was doing. So basically what I am saying is that there are ways around it where you can still get help if you need it.
Yes the AI is very good sometimes at telling you exactly what you want to hear as Albalaha as said and so you just have use your common sense and take from it what you need.
In conclusion, my dialogue with the various AI machines has been very helpful and I would certainly say it helped accelerate my learning and understanding as well regarding some of my concepts that I use for gambling.
Cheers