Roulette Ideas

Hi, I actually talk about that detail in the post. The reason I developed the hardware for the automatic betting system is because, for the average user, having to manually input each spin can be tiring and tedious. The system needs at least 500 rounds before it can give you a betting signal, and even then, it might not generate one if it doesn't find a suitable opportunity based on its calculations.

It's a very powerful system, but due to the complexity of the calculations it performs, it requires a significant amount of data to provide a highly effective estimate of which two pockets are the most convenient to bet on.

In the coming weeks, I'll be uploading a complementary version of the software. It's essentially the same system, but I've added a new feature that allows you to simulate full sessions by loading a spin history from a text file. This will give you a faster and clearer idea of how profitable the system can be.

ZECHNAS METHOD
(by J.Zechnas)

I follow the Zechnas Method, my personal system for tackling roulette.

My approach involves using multiple systems in different ways. Sometimes, I'll use one system as a "lure" and another as a "recovery" mechanism in case a session turns completely negative —because, let's be honest, that can happen depending on the systems you employ.

With highly reliable systems (the five-star ones, so to speak) or special systems, recovery periods are few and far between. However, if you're using medium-probability systems, you'll find yourself in recovery mode more often.

Another strategy is to combine several high-probability systems. These collectively cover over 85% of outcomes, and I adjust them based on the wheel's developing trends, always aiming for the most favorable setup possible. In the short to medium term, probability can indeed overcome randomness. Here's a crude example: If you cover 34 out of 37 numbers repeatedly, but crucially, using different systems each time, the mathematical probability of those remaining three numbers (which don't have to be the same ones) appearing becomes minimal. This isn't the case if you use the same system, as, theoretically, those 3 out of 37 would appear. So, it's about "playing with randomness" against "randomness" itself.

Entropy is precisely that, and we're now starting to be able to bring order to chaos in many aspects. The only thing standing in our way was our lack of understanding.

---

---

Any moderately acceptable system has a good chance of starting strong and winning for a few sessions; we all know this, and we've seen it ourselves.

The real trick lies in studying a system's resilience against dispersions and, crucially, knowing when not to push it past its "point of no return."

After extensive testing, if we find that a particular system comfortably handles, on average, 6 to 8 sessions, we should never push it beyond half plus one of that average. Doing so exponentially increases the probability in our favor.

From there, the strategy is to move on and exploit another one of the five-star (*****) systems in your arsenal, then another, and so on, completing a full cycle of the systems you have in play for that day.

In the next round, you can start playing them randomly, or better yet, capitalize on the trends that are already forming on the roulette table to maximize your returns.

If the day has been typical, after 4 or 5 rounds of play, you'll have accumulated enough profit to either stop playing or, if you've encountered any setbacks, deploy one of your recovery parachutes to salvage the session that wasn't going your way.

There are no more secrets to the Zechnas Method.

You all know good systems that can serve this purpose.

---

Note: The thread is locked because it is a work in progress / More Zechnas content to come.

ZECHNAS' TEST TO DETERMINE A SYSTEM'S EFFICIENCY

I classify my programs based on the actuals I run them through, as follows:

• Up to 25,000 spins and at least 100 different actuals: 55-100% sessions won.
• Up to 50,000 spins and at least 200 different actuals: 60-75% sessions won.
• Up to 75,000 spins and at least 300 different actuals: 65-70% sessions won.
• At least 1,000,000 spins and at least 400 different actuals: 65% sessions won.
• At least 250,000 spins and at least 1000 different actuals: 60% sessions won.

As I check the systems, they either move up to a higher classification or remain stagnant, awaiting new actuals or last-minute modifications to improve them.

• SYSTEMS THAT DON'T PASS THE FIRST SCREENING WITH OVER 55% OF SESSIONS WON ARE DISCARDED.
• I ALSO SUBJECT THEM TO THE INVERSE ACTUALS AS A SECURITY MEASURE, AS I BELIEVE A GOOD SYSTEM...
• ...SHOULD MAINTAIN ITS PERFORMANCE REGARDLESS OF IT BEING TESTED ON NORMAL OR INVERTED ACTUALS.

I don't sell systems, and my interest is purely ludic.

---

I only play the 5-star systems. I've checked over 1000 systems in my 30 years of experience, and only a maximum of 1 percent are truly worthwhile. However, by relying on programming, I can improve systems. I admit that sometimes, from an average system (3 stars), I've managed to create a good one (4 or 5 stars) by improving its entries and exits, money management, progressions, or by combining it with others.

It's a lot of work, but what can I say, since I enjoy it, it doesn't weigh on me. Still, time is important. I have several network trackers running 24 hours a day, searching for new system ideas. Believe me, the Spanish, Portuguese, Italians, and South American countries are the most ingenious and have the best methods when it comes to designing gaming strategies.

---

RULES FOR PASSING THE TESTS:

• A minimum gain per spin for a good system that has passed through actuals.
• Must pass the inverse actuals. (Apply Inverted V1.0 program).
• The average number of spins at which a gain is obtained must be determined.
• A maximum number of spins played must be set, beyond which the session is considered lost, regardless of the bets or progressions played. This is a way to propose the point of no return when maintaining a positive balance becomes problematic.

J.Zechnas./5/2022

I am making a new page "As Seen on Youtube" which will allow users to test systems that youtubers have made videos about. Bookmark the page as this is an ongoing project.

https://gamble-galaxy.com/ytube/index.html

Free tool for dealer signature tracking.

https://gamble-galaxy.com/shop/sims/dealer_signature/index.html

CARPANTA'S SYSTEM FOR DOUBLE-STREET REPETITION WITH A SOFT PROGRESSION:
=======================================================

At Edgardo's request, I'm going to share a system that has worked well for me..

This system belongs to the forum member Carpanta and was published in the "Arcane forum" and tested by several players with positive results in all cases.

---

I know that the cutting point for taking a profit is "the crux" of winning at roulette.

Lately, I set the cut based on being able to close a micro-game in positive, even if it's just +1 chip.

My proposal is the following, you'll see!...

I wait for a double street repetition, a DS from the table layout; when this happens, I start playing 1 chip. If I lose, I continue with 1 until I lose five, then I continue with 2, etc. But if that double street has repeated once, and in the course of the next few spins another pattern repeats, I start playing it too. So, playing two double streets, I will play like this:

1.1
1.1
2.1
2.2
3.2
etc.

It's somewhat an "Atila betting" application, applied to this case.

If while I'm playing the 2 double streets that repeated, a third repetition occurs, then I immediately play this last double street that appeared + the previous one, discarding the oldest, and always like that. The only thing I don't cut and do maintain is the progression I was on previously.

If I have 1 win and I'm still in negative, then I continue with the progression until I win and end up in positive, recovering the passive of the previous losses + some profit chips.

You don't "parachute" on a win; instead, you return to the initial betting chip.

You'll be surprised to see that sooner or later, 2 or 3 consecutive wins will occur, allowing us to close the micro-game in positive.

In some cases, the passive (losses) can shoot up quite a bit, but it eventually closes as I said.

You need 500 chips to play this way, and you can aim for a daily profit of 100 chips. If you study it, you'll tell me. It's the best "system" I know to date, and it's enough to go eat coconuts under a palm tree in the Caribbean.
Regards,

CarlosGa.

---

Well, I've adjusted the game to my liking and introduced some changes:

1) A 100-chip bankroll to aim for 30 to 50 chips of profit.

2) Carpanta talks about following the progression until recovering the passive and being at least 1 chip up. When I have a win, even if I'm still in negative, I look at the balance and the progression step, and if I can lower it, I do so to avoid the risk of a climb in the progression.

3) When the progression is at 3 or more, I always place one chip on the square/cormer formed by the last number that appeared in that line.

4) When I look for a double street repetition, I do it within the last 6 or 7 spins.

Courtesy of Zechnas/2022

I tested the software, recorded 300 spins+ no prediction..

Quote from: FreeRoulette on May 22, 2025, 04:24 PMLooking forward to seeing the web version.

RIBOTX is active on the WEB at: https://rouletteideas.com/ribotx/

Simply click on the module name to select it, then hit the "Launch modules" button.





Very streamlined!

amazing work, im trying the software side now, will let you know how I find it.