Recent posts
#1
ULTIMATE ROULETTE TOOL / Re: URT - $97 one year
Last post by WallyGator - Dec 28, 2024, 04:49 PMThanks so much Vic!
#2
ULTIMATE ROULETTE TOOL / Re: ULTIMATE ROULETTE TOOL - D...
Last post by VLS - Dec 27, 2024, 02:42 AMUPDATE!:
https://rouletteideas.com/profile/?area=subscriptions
Some fellow users are forwarding reports of the tool displaying the same number for multiple spins: Please don't worry, this is intentional / by design.
- Currently adding +/- registry to the active session page.
- Finalizing the "PLUS GROWTH" money management thread for publication.
- Added a monthly tier to our subscriptions, offering a 25% discount compared to the weekly price.
- Our introductory annual price of $97/year remains available until December 31, 2024. This one-time offer (equivalent to $1.86 per week) will not be repeated. Like our other tiers, it grants full Subscriber group access, including the RIBOT PORTABLE bot and any other offerings launched throughout 2025.
https://rouletteideas.com/profile/?area=subscriptions
Some fellow users are forwarding reports of the tool displaying the same number for multiple spins: Please don't worry, this is intentional / by design.
#3
Concepts / I was just wondering...
Last post by BlueAngel - Dec 24, 2024, 01:17 PMLet's suppose that House Edge is an insignificant issue, merely a taxation on our profits, thus the major obstacle we have to overcome is variance.
So how could we deal with variance?
For the example's sake I'm going to present you with a hypothesis on which we are gambling in a 50/50 game, such as even chances on Roulette, "banker" VS "player" on Baccarat, "pass" VS "don't pass"...etc.
When there's positive variance we have to do nothing because we are winners, but when we have negative variance we have to wait until variance undone its own manifestation...in other words, if we were trailing by 10 losses more than wins, we would be unable to overcome the negative deficit simply because we can never be 100% sure about when exactly a win is going to occur, with any kind of progression/MM.
Yes. we are going to win eventually, but since we don't know exactly when it's useless, or even harmful to attempt to raise the bets when negative variance still in action.
So by making an assumption that negative variance will eventually anule,offset,negate its own negative with a positive variance the only thing which we would have to be concerned with is the HE in regards with the duration since the negative variance begun till the time negative variance will end.
Let me become more specific;
I've found myself 10 losses in the hole, I kept flat betting for the whole duration till after 3 cycles of 37 spins/bets the positive variance made me win 10 times more, effectively offsetting the negative variance before, but since there were 111 bets I'm still -3 units overall thanks to the House Edge, at exactly this point in time, when there's not any losses left from negative variance, we are going to bet just enough to surpass the negative balance coming from the HE exclusively!
On the specific example 4 units bet in order to come on top with only a single win in the positive side (ours).
In case that eventful moment wouldn't come with a win, then wait again until the losses will become equal to the wins, then bet again to overcome the HE deficit plus any lost units from previous, failed attempts.
I want to be 100% clear, I'm not advocating such betting method, like I said before it's merely based on the assumption that only variance could "beat" itself.
Let's assume that this hypothesis is true, but how long before setting the record straight???
Hours? Day? Weeks?
I would really appreciate your colaboration, I want to know about what do you really think, could be such an approach viable, effective and practical?
So how could we deal with variance?
For the example's sake I'm going to present you with a hypothesis on which we are gambling in a 50/50 game, such as even chances on Roulette, "banker" VS "player" on Baccarat, "pass" VS "don't pass"...etc.
When there's positive variance we have to do nothing because we are winners, but when we have negative variance we have to wait until variance undone its own manifestation...in other words, if we were trailing by 10 losses more than wins, we would be unable to overcome the negative deficit simply because we can never be 100% sure about when exactly a win is going to occur, with any kind of progression/MM.
Yes. we are going to win eventually, but since we don't know exactly when it's useless, or even harmful to attempt to raise the bets when negative variance still in action.
So by making an assumption that negative variance will eventually anule,offset,negate its own negative with a positive variance the only thing which we would have to be concerned with is the HE in regards with the duration since the negative variance begun till the time negative variance will end.
Let me become more specific;
I've found myself 10 losses in the hole, I kept flat betting for the whole duration till after 3 cycles of 37 spins/bets the positive variance made me win 10 times more, effectively offsetting the negative variance before, but since there were 111 bets I'm still -3 units overall thanks to the House Edge, at exactly this point in time, when there's not any losses left from negative variance, we are going to bet just enough to surpass the negative balance coming from the HE exclusively!
On the specific example 4 units bet in order to come on top with only a single win in the positive side (ours).
In case that eventful moment wouldn't come with a win, then wait again until the losses will become equal to the wins, then bet again to overcome the HE deficit plus any lost units from previous, failed attempts.
I want to be 100% clear, I'm not advocating such betting method, like I said before it's merely based on the assumption that only variance could "beat" itself.
Let's assume that this hypothesis is true, but how long before setting the record straight???
Hours? Day? Weeks?
I would really appreciate your colaboration, I want to know about what do you really think, could be such an approach viable, effective and practical?
#4
ULTIMATE ROULETTE TOOL / Re: URT - $97 one year
Last post by VLS - Dec 23, 2024, 09:53 PMJust confirming URL database index maintenance is complete and your new profile link is accessible without any other changes to your account:
https://rouletteideas.com/profile/WallyGator/
Anything else, you can reach me either by PM or betselection@gmail.com
https://rouletteideas.com/profile/WallyGator/
Anything else, you can reach me either by PM or betselection@gmail.com
#5
Numbers / Re: Targeting numbers from the...
Last post by BlueAngel - Dec 23, 2024, 07:10 PMYes sure, although I feel that a small sample will demonstrate these betting principles in a specific way, thus leaving less room for vague inerpretations.
1 This is the first number, oldest in the list.
23 The 2nd number is both different dozen and column, on the same time is 2 out of 3 ECs the same.
Therefore we are looking for a repeat in dozen and column in combination with 2 different out of 3 EC pairs.
Finally the revertion principle between column and dozen in this case we have 2nd dozen and 2nd column from the last spun number 23, thus we would check the nubers: 14,17,20,23 if any of them could be combined with 2 different EC pairs out of 3. 14 is qualified, 17 is qualified and 20 is qualified in regards with 23, the last spun number.
34 Bet 14,17,20 and we are losing 3 units. From 23 to 34 there are 2 different ECs and 1 of the same, also 2 different dozens and 2 different columns within 2 last spins. The revertion principle indicates that from 34 which belongs to 3rd dozen and 1st column should become 1st dozen and 3rd column, but since the previous number was 23 which belongs to 2nd dozen and 2nd column, there wouldn't be any repeat for dozens and coluns within the last 3 spins, we wouldn't bet on the next spin.
29 No bet, here there is a change of 2 ECs out of 3, 29 belongs to the 3rd dozen and the 2nd column, different column and same dozen from the previous number, by reverting we have 2nd dozen and 3rd column, but it doesn't match the principle for the columns because it would be 3 different within the 3 last spins. Therefore no bet.
19 2 of the same ECs and 2 different dozens and columns within the last 2 spins. By reverting the number 19 from 2nd dozen/1st column into 1st dozen/2nd column we find out that it would be 3 different dozens in the last 3 spins, thus we would not bet.
18 No bet. There's a repeat of dozen, but not for column, additionally there are 2 different ECs. From 2nd dozen/3rd column we revert to 3rd dozen/2nd column, but we find out that there would be 3 different columns within the last 3 spins. Conclusion, discard.
33 Here we have a repeat for columns and 2 different dozens, we should expect a repeat for a dozen and another column (different). We revert 3rd dozen/3rd column into 3rd dozen/3rd column, there wouldn't be another column, thus discard.
20 2 of the same ECs and different dozen and column within the 2 last spins. From 2nd dozen/2nd column we revert to 2nd dozen/2nd column and this time it satisfies our betting criteria in regards with the dozens & columns.
From 14,17,20,23 we would select the number(s) with 2 different ECs in regards with number 20, in this case all 3, except number 20, are qualified.
1 Bet 14,17,23. We would lose 3 units with an overall balance of -6. Here there are 3 different ECs in combination with different dozen and column. By reverting from 1st dozen/1st column into 1st dozen/1st column we would have a repeaticion for dozen and column, thus it'd satisfy our dozens & columns betting principle.
From the numbers: 1,4,7,10 we should select only those which would be 2 different ECs/1 EC same in comparison with the last spun number, 1. Two numbers are qualified: 4 and 10.
4 Bet 4 and 10. Win 35 units - 6 = 29 units net
27
3
30
17
5
5
32
19
31
10
35
8
15
11
16
29
20
5
7
26
22
10
1 This is the first number, oldest in the list.
23 The 2nd number is both different dozen and column, on the same time is 2 out of 3 ECs the same.
Therefore we are looking for a repeat in dozen and column in combination with 2 different out of 3 EC pairs.
Finally the revertion principle between column and dozen in this case we have 2nd dozen and 2nd column from the last spun number 23, thus we would check the nubers: 14,17,20,23 if any of them could be combined with 2 different EC pairs out of 3. 14 is qualified, 17 is qualified and 20 is qualified in regards with 23, the last spun number.
34 Bet 14,17,20 and we are losing 3 units. From 23 to 34 there are 2 different ECs and 1 of the same, also 2 different dozens and 2 different columns within 2 last spins. The revertion principle indicates that from 34 which belongs to 3rd dozen and 1st column should become 1st dozen and 3rd column, but since the previous number was 23 which belongs to 2nd dozen and 2nd column, there wouldn't be any repeat for dozens and coluns within the last 3 spins, we wouldn't bet on the next spin.
29 No bet, here there is a change of 2 ECs out of 3, 29 belongs to the 3rd dozen and the 2nd column, different column and same dozen from the previous number, by reverting we have 2nd dozen and 3rd column, but it doesn't match the principle for the columns because it would be 3 different within the 3 last spins. Therefore no bet.
19 2 of the same ECs and 2 different dozens and columns within the last 2 spins. By reverting the number 19 from 2nd dozen/1st column into 1st dozen/2nd column we find out that it would be 3 different dozens in the last 3 spins, thus we would not bet.
18 No bet. There's a repeat of dozen, but not for column, additionally there are 2 different ECs. From 2nd dozen/3rd column we revert to 3rd dozen/2nd column, but we find out that there would be 3 different columns within the last 3 spins. Conclusion, discard.
33 Here we have a repeat for columns and 2 different dozens, we should expect a repeat for a dozen and another column (different). We revert 3rd dozen/3rd column into 3rd dozen/3rd column, there wouldn't be another column, thus discard.
20 2 of the same ECs and different dozen and column within the 2 last spins. From 2nd dozen/2nd column we revert to 2nd dozen/2nd column and this time it satisfies our betting criteria in regards with the dozens & columns.
From 14,17,20,23 we would select the number(s) with 2 different ECs in regards with number 20, in this case all 3, except number 20, are qualified.
1 Bet 14,17,23. We would lose 3 units with an overall balance of -6. Here there are 3 different ECs in combination with different dozen and column. By reverting from 1st dozen/1st column into 1st dozen/1st column we would have a repeaticion for dozen and column, thus it'd satisfy our dozens & columns betting principle.
From the numbers: 1,4,7,10 we should select only those which would be 2 different ECs/1 EC same in comparison with the last spun number, 1. Two numbers are qualified: 4 and 10.
4 Bet 4 and 10. Win 35 units - 6 = 29 units net
27
3
30
17
5
5
32
19
31
10
35
8
15
11
16
29
20
5
7
26
22
10
#6
Numbers / Re: Targeting numbers from the...
Last post by VLS - Dec 23, 2024, 05:10 PMThanks for your participation, dear Angelo. I'm carefully reviewing this to begin coding it as a new module.
We don't see much flat betting threads around the forums, so you've certainly caught my attention (and I'm sure, the community's as well).
In case more clarification is needed, I'll "ping" with a message here.
Cheers!
Vic
Quote from: BlueAngel on Dec 03, 2024, 11:03 AMNo progression whatsoever is being used, just flat bets.
We don't see much flat betting threads around the forums, so you've certainly caught my attention (and I'm sure, the community's as well).
In case more clarification is needed, I'll "ping" with a message here.
Cheers!
Vic
#7
ULTIMATE ROULETTE TOOL / Re: URT - $97 one year
Last post by VLS - Dec 23, 2024, 03:40 PMQuote from: VLS on Dec 20, 2024, 07:02 PMP.S. Alternatively, I can change your account username to "WallyGator", without the space.
(It will reset your password, so the forum would email you to restore it)
Hello dear Wally, as mentioned via PM, your account has been changed to "WallyGator".
Now please check your email inbox.
Many thanks again for your support!
#8
RIBOT discussion / RIBOT WEB and PORTABLE
Last post by VLS - Dec 22, 2024, 06:13 AMHello guys! Here's an update on our RIBOT software for 2025:
It is this portable version that will be covered by our subscription, as a single package containing ALL the modules and the bot, for only $10.
A very affordable price point for a live casino-play bot.
To clarify: RIBOT WEB will always remain 100% free, while the portable/downloadable version (including the cross-site casino interaction code) will be available via our single RouletteIdeas.com subscription, covering both the Tool and the portable bot, for the same all-inclusive price.
That's the 2025 plan for RIBOT! :)
- All the RIBOT WEB releases are kept 100% Free for the community.
- A new RIBOT PORTABLE downloadable program is in the making to be the official bot for live casino play and -of course- our Ultimate Roulette Tool offering.
It is this portable version that will be covered by our subscription, as a single package containing ALL the modules and the bot, for only $10.
A very affordable price point for a live casino-play bot.
To clarify: RIBOT WEB will always remain 100% free, while the portable/downloadable version (including the cross-site casino interaction code) will be available via our single RouletteIdeas.com subscription, covering both the Tool and the portable bot, for the same all-inclusive price.
That's the 2025 plan for RIBOT! :)
#9
ULTIMATE ROULETTE TOOL / Re: URT - usage instructions
Last post by VLS - Dec 22, 2024, 04:59 AMHello @FRANKT, welcome to the board 🤝.
Thanks for your support!
You can find the live Tool at this link:
To use it, simply enter the first number and click "Submit" to start a session.
It's currently recommended to keep the bank at 100, as this is the baseline progression: x1, x2, x3).
It needs to collect one full cycle, so you'll get the first numbers to bet somewhere after spin #37 up to around #56.
The Tool will then continue calling numbers continuously.
You end the active session by hitting the "Finish" button.
Also, please note that there is the possibility of skips, since the tool errs on the side of caution, as mentioned in the relevant topic: Knowing when NOT to bet.
Cheers!
Vic
Quote from: FRANKT on Dec 05, 2024, 03:32 PMI subscribed to URT for a month yesterday.
Thanks for your support!
Quote from: FRANKT on Dec 05, 2024, 03:32 PMWhere is this tool?
You can find the live Tool at this link:
Quote from: FRANKT on Dec 05, 2024, 03:32 PMHow can I use it?
To use it, simply enter the first number and click "Submit" to start a session.
It's currently recommended to keep the bank at 100, as this is the baseline progression: x1, x2, x3).
It needs to collect one full cycle, so you'll get the first numbers to bet somewhere after spin #37 up to around #56.
The Tool will then continue calling numbers continuously.
You end the active session by hitting the "Finish" button.
Also, please note that there is the possibility of skips, since the tool errs on the side of caution, as mentioned in the relevant topic: Knowing when NOT to bet.
Cheers!
Vic
#10
ULTIMATE ROULETTE TOOL / Re: ULTIMATE ROULETTE TOOL - D...
Last post by VLS - Dec 21, 2024, 07:03 PMHello & good day! More relevant URT info:
- Memberships are stackable, meaning you can have multiple plans active simultaneously to extend your subscription time while using the current one normally.
- A new main thread is being created as an organized URT information index, featuring all relevant details and links.
- The whole URT system being programmed is "A2F+G": "All-In to Free Play" (A2F) creates a risk-free bankroll. Then, "Plus Growth" (+G) money management is applied, increasing the unit value vertically based on the initial 100-unit bankroll while adding initial/base units horizontally to dynamically expand the betting bank. This allows for greater resilience against variance as the game progresses. Essentially, it's starting every cycle in a better position (with more sponsored steps in the progression and a higher probability of success). Even if you "lose it all", it can only add won units to your average, by virtue of the created bankroll risk being assumed entirely by the casino!.
You can experience the "baseline" bet selection now, the foundation of our multi-bankroll scheme.
Once the full Multi-Bankroll system is integrated, users can easily create variations. This is made possible by the Tool's user-configurable fields.
For example, the "Bank" field, which determines the active cycle bankroll, is already dynamic:
We're designating December as the month of the original A2F+G system! 😊
- Memberships are stackable, meaning you can have multiple plans active simultaneously to extend your subscription time while using the current one normally.
- A new main thread is being created as an organized URT information index, featuring all relevant details and links.
- The whole URT system being programmed is "A2F+G": "All-In to Free Play" (A2F) creates a risk-free bankroll. Then, "Plus Growth" (+G) money management is applied, increasing the unit value vertically based on the initial 100-unit bankroll while adding initial/base units horizontally to dynamically expand the betting bank. This allows for greater resilience against variance as the game progresses. Essentially, it's starting every cycle in a better position (with more sponsored steps in the progression and a higher probability of success). Even if you "lose it all", it can only add won units to your average, by virtue of the created bankroll risk being assumed entirely by the casino!.
You can experience the "baseline" bet selection now, the foundation of our multi-bankroll scheme.
Once the full Multi-Bankroll system is integrated, users can easily create variations. This is made possible by the Tool's user-configurable fields.
For example, the "Bank" field, which determines the active cycle bankroll, is already dynamic:
We're designating December as the month of the original A2F+G system! 😊